Complaints Procedure — Flat Clearance Islington
Flat Clearance Islington is committed to providing a professional and reliable rubbish removal and flat clearance service across the service area. This complaints procedure sets out how concerns about flat clearances, waste removal and related services are recorded, investigated and resolved in a timely, fair and transparent manner. It outlines the scope, timescales, investigation stages and potential remedies, and explains escalation routes within the organisation. It applies equally to private landlords, tenants and estate representatives and seeks to resolve issues without legal escalation where possible. The policy is independent of contractual payment arrangements and applies whether services are delivered by small teams or wider crews.
Scope and purpose: This policy applies to all service activities that form part of the flat clearance offering, including internal rubbish removal, bulk item collection, clearance of residential premises and associated site management. The procedure is intended to protect customers and ensure consistent service standards while balancing operational and regulatory obligations. It aims to provide a clear, consistent approach so that service recipients understand how issues will be handled and how decisions are reached.
Complaints should be made promptly and must include enough detail to enable a proper assessment. Please describe the service date, general location (area only), nature of the issue, names of operatives if known, and the outcome sought. Photographic evidence and any job references will assist in a swift investigation. Complaints involving health and safety or potential environmental harm will be prioritised. Where immediate corrective action is possible, such as arranging a return visit to remove missed items, that may be offered while a fuller investigation proceeds.
How to make a complaint
To ensure a timely response, submit a clear account of the concern in writing through the channel used to arrange the service, referencing the job type, such as flat clearance or waste collection, and the date of the visit. The organisation records all complaints in a central register to enable tracking, consistency and learning. If the original booking included specific instructions or constraints, include those in the complaint to assist assessment. The register helps ensure fairness in comparisons between cases.
On receipt, an acknowledgment will be issued within three working days that contains the complaint reference and the name of the staff member responsible for managing the case. The acknowledgement will explain the planned investigation steps and provide an expected timeframe for resolution. If the complaint relates to damage, please describe the damage and, where practical, provide evidence of the item's pre-service condition.
Investigation and evidence
The investigation will be proportionate to the nature of the allegation. Typical steps include:- review of job sheets, manifests and operative notes;
- interviewing staff involved in the clearance;
- reviewing photographic evidence;
- assessing compliance with waste management and safety standards.
Throughout the investigation, the complainant will be informed of material developments and may be invited to provide further information. Records of communications and actions taken are maintained for accountability. Confidentiality will be respected except where disclosure is required by law or to protect safety. Complainants will be updated at key milestones and given opportunities to comment on factual findings before case closure.
The investigating officer will prepare a report that summarises findings and recommends actions. The report will consider whether operational procedures were followed, whether any damage or loss occurred, and if remedial steps are required to rectify outcomes or prevent recurrence. The organisation will note any acceptance of liability and record any agreed timescales for remedial work.
If the investigation concludes that service standards were not met, the organisation will propose remedies which may include, where appropriate, a partial refund, repeat work, an apology or an agreed remedial plan. Remedies are applied proportionately and in accordance with consumer protection expectations and waste management obligations. Where remedies involve third parties, the organisation will coordinate reasonably to implement agreed solutions.
Decisions and remedial actions will be communicated in writing. These communications will set out the factual basis for conclusions, actions taken and the rationale for the remedy offered. The aim is to be clear and transparent, enabling the complainant to understand the basis of the outcome and any limitations to redress. Senior reviewers will consider the original evidence, any new material provided and the proportionality of the remedy.
Where a complainant remains dissatisfied following the initial outcome, an escalation route is available. A formal escalation triggers a second-stage review by senior management who were not involved in the first-stage investigation. This ensures independence and objectivity in reassessing the case. The organisation will not unreasonably prolong reviews and will explain any necessary delays.
Escalation requests will be acknowledged promptly and reviewed within a stated timescale, typically completed within 15 working days unless further investigation is required and the complainant is kept informed of any extension. Extensions will only be used where additional evidence collection or external consultation is necessary.
Time limits for submitting complaints: the organisation encourages customers to submit complaints within a reasonable period following the event, ordinarily within 60 days. Exceptions may be considered where there is a valid reason for delay or where the issue only became apparent later. Exceptional cases with latent defects or complex discovery may be considered outside the ordinary period.
Unreasonable or abusive behaviour is managed in accordance with principles of fairness and staff safety. The organisation reserves the right to apply proportionate contact measures where communications are persistent and abusive, and such measures will be documented in case records. Measures taken will be communicated and logged, and any restricted access will be proportionate and time-limited.
Monitoring and learning: complaints are recorded and analysed to identify trends. Findings lead to training, procedural updates and operational changes aimed at reducing recurrence and improving the quality of flat clearance and rubbish removal services across the service area. Quarterly reports summarising complaint categories and corrective actions support senior oversight and continuous improvement.
Data retention and confidentiality: All complaint records are retained for the period necessary to satisfy legal and regulatory requirements and to enable service improvement. Personal data is handled in accordance with applicable privacy principles and only disclosed where necessary for investigation, enforcement or legal compliance. Retention periods are reviewed periodically to balance evidential needs with data minimisation principles.
External review: where disputes cannot be resolved internally, complainants may seek independent review or alternative dispute resolution through appropriate bodies. The organisation cooperates with regulators and independent adjudicators and will provide documentation of its internal handling without supplying direct contact details within this policy. Where independent adjudication is pursued, the organisation will supply a concise case dossier summarising key facts and internal findings to assist fair consideration.
Final provisions: this Complaints Procedure does not affect statutory rights. It is designed to ensure that concerns about flat clearance, domestic rubbish removal and associated waste clearance are taken seriously and addressed promptly, consistently and fairly. All staff are trained on this procedure so that complainants encounter a consistent approach regardless of the operative or office handling their case. Regular review of the procedure ensures it remains appropriate to operational needs and regulatory expectations.